So then, we can't vote for our own fights? I dislike that rule. Also, I think that there should be editable sections for "votes for article1" and "votes for article2" and "peanut gallery". King Nothing Where's your crown? 12:51, September 26, 2010 (UTC)
- Well, that would be exceedingly redundant as you already nominated it. A nomination is a vote. I agree with the peanut gallery, but I don't think editable sections for each nomination is necessary, at least for now. Maybe if the votes increase more, but at the moment it isn't really a big deal, in my opinion... However, if you have another reason for it, please bring it forward. --NitrousXΩ
- On that part, I meant for the Gathering Place itself. King Nothing Where's your crown? 18:46, September 26, 2010 (UTC)
- Wait, what? What for the Gathering Place? Editable Sections or something else? --NitrousXΩ
- Editable sections. Escaflowne X 20:10, September 26, 2010 (UTC)
EDIT: I can add in something for it to be editable sections. Would you guys like that? It's a buttload of code, though. --A Crono of the Silver kind 21:06, October 26, 2010 (UTC)
Guys, do we really need the "ineligible categories" rule for the ARENA? Featured Article, I can understand. But the vast majority of articles are characters, which is going to make coming up with good arena fights harder. I'd like to protest that rule. King Nothing Where's your crown? 13:10, November 3, 2010 (UTC)
Also, in the same vein, I'd like to propose a "votes against" column for proposed fights if there are votes for. - +DeadlySlashSword+ 14:04, November 3, 2010 (UTC)
Is this how I do this? This is my first try. Anyway, weapons: I nominate Volver a la Vida. I'm still kinda proud of it. Xelak: The Last KeyBender!!! 03:32, November 3, 2010 (UTC)
... This is for the fanon arena. Were you looking for the featured article? King Nothing Where's your crown? 12:57, November 3, 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
|